It's really quite simple. We believe in developing partnerships with our clients so that we can understand what is most important to them and be trusted to take care of their best interests. We are committed to plain talking, taking a pragmatic, commercial approach to the work that we do and acting with integrity and honesty.
We are not your typical law firm. We follow no preset notion of what a law firm should look like, operate like or act like. We put a lot of effort into ensuring that we provide the highest quality service to our clients in an environment that is professionally and personally rewarding.
We provide specialist legal advice to a wide range of businesses and business people primarily involved in the shipping, logistics and international trade sectors.
Critical to our ethos and approach is working in partnership with our clients to truly understand what is most important to them, enabling us to deliver outstanding value when we take care of their best interests.
As specialist commercial lawyers we are able to assist on the full range of corporate and commercial matters and offer comprehensive support for businesses.
Working closely with the marine and non-marine insurance markets we advise and assist on a wide range of issues.
From compliance to investigation and prosecution, we advise and represent clients in a variety of regulated areas.
We provide a specialist and integrated legal service to the renewables sector on a wide range of issues.
We are committed to sharing our expertise and knowledge as well as keeping you up to date with all our news. If you're looking for expert comment across any of our practice areas, have any other media enquiries or to find out more about our news stories, please contact Carol Stovin.
The London Circuit Commercial Court has introduced a voluntary pilot scheme for capped costs litigation.
In the recent judgement Barton v Wright Hassall LLP  UKSC 12 the Supreme Court has considered the power under CPR 6.15(2) to order that steps already taken to bring the claim form to the attention of the defendant by an alternative method or at an alternative place is good service.
There are some cases where (and perhaps with a degree of hindsight) it is difficult to see how there could be any other outcome. Lukoil Asia Pacific PTE Limited v Ocean Tankers (PTE) Limited  is one of them.